Gaius Julius
Posts : 2 Join date : 2009-07-19
| Subject: Re: treatys why dont we get 1? Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:10 am | |
| It would really help us both in a war. | |
|
Imcoolindian Admin
Posts : 6 Join date : 2009-06-21
| Subject: Re: treatys why dont we get 1? Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:53 pm | |
| - XxdeathangelxX wrote:
- why dont we get at least one treaty because we could do with one becuase we could be hit by another alliance and we would be doomed but not if we had a treaty we would be able to at least put up a decent fight and are treaty a brothers could cunter attack and give usn the much neede troops
We are treated Roman Senate, but we both trying to be more than a treat more advance. | |
|
Gaius Julius
Posts : 2 Join date : 2009-07-19
| Subject: SPQR offered a mutual assistance agreement! Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:18 pm | |
| I am the Leader of the SPQR alliance. I have offered a mutual assistance agreement to your alliance leader. Not sure if he has accepted it or not yet. But if he does accept it, Roman Republic & Roman Senate Will help each other in any kind of wars at all times in any way possible. Hopefully SPQR will be able to help... | |
|
XxdeathangelxX
Posts : 1 Join date : 2009-07-22
| Subject: treatys why dont we get 1? Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:03 pm | |
| why dont we get at least one treaty because we could do with one becuase we could be hit by another alliance and we would be doomed but not if we had a treaty we would be able to at least put up a decent fight and are treaty a brothers could cunter attack and give usn the much neede troops | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: treatys why dont we get 1? | |
| |
|